The Da Vinci Code: Movie Review

If you read the book I don’t think you need to see The Da Vinci Code.  Since I found out there was going to be a movie I avoided reading the book.  I’m glad I did. I think if I had I would have fallen asleep.  While I found the plot and its twists to be very entertaining, my date, who had read the book, fell asleep on several occasions.  Even the 48 ounce Diet Coke we shared couldn’t keep her in the land of the conscious. 

 

The plot is fun and all the information provided about a semi-invented history of Christianity is interesting.  If you have never been to Paris or France seeing all the cathedrals, chateaus, and churches certainly will whet your appetite.

 

Tom Hanks doesn’t seem smart enough to be believable as Professor Robert Langdon, but Audrey Tautou who plays Sophie Nevue is a drop dead cutie.  I just wanted to reach up to the screen and hug her every time she appears.  Jean Reno, who I have never seen playing anything but a French police detective, managed to get Ron Howard to put him in that same role.

 

In conclusion:

 

Reasons to see The Da Vinci Code:

1. Audrey Tautou.

2. You’ve never seen a documentary about the Crusades and have never heard of the Knights of the Templar.

3. You like mysteries.

4. You enjoy movie theatre popcorn.

5. You miss Paris and want to see some great filmographic shots of it.

6. You saw a documentary of the Crusades and love that sort of historical intellectualizing, even if it’s made up.

7. You like guessing obvious plot twists.  This can be especially fun if you keep telling the person next to you what’s going to happen next. (p.s. make sure the guy behind you is smaller than you are).

 

You should not see The Da Vinci Code if two or more of the following conditions apply to you:

1. You read the book.

2. You have been to France.

3. You don’t like pretty French women.

4. You don’t find history interesting.

5. You are an intolerant Christian (I believe the vast majority of Christians are tolerant) who cannot handle intellectualized fictitious theories that conflict with your highly intolerant world view.

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments
Page: 1 of 1
  • 16 Jul 2006, 10:56 PM Francine wrote:
    Tom Hanks. All the anticipation
    but definitely a disappointment as Dr. Langdon. I would have preferred Bill
    Pullman or Morgan Freeman...remember he
    played Dr. Alex Cross in James Patterson's Along Came a Spider.

    Audrey Tautou....another disappointment. No chemistry between
    her and Hanks.

    Granted this wasn't a documentary but
    many Christians were upset or enraged
    over the content of the movie.

    I compare it with the reaction within
    the Jewish Community toward Gibson's
    The Passion of the Christ.


    Dan Brown's Angels and Demons was a
    better read and was disappointed it
    wasn't chosen over Da Vinci for a movie. The Da Vinci movie flat lined..
    no pulse.

    Good...I prefer my e address not be
    published.
    Thanks!
    Reply to this
    1. 17 Jul 2006, 8:36 AM David Neubert wrote:
      Thanks for your great comment. Your email is never published.  The only thing that would ever be published is a website should you choose to add one.
      Reply to this

Page: 1 of 1
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.